On 17 Mar 17:52, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:12 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Is it ok for trunk? > >> Do we need to backport it to 4.8? > It does, but the situation is the same as with %eax vs. %rax names. > So, I think the patch is OK for mainline, and similar patch involving > only %ymm names for AVX-enabled branches.
Thanks, Uroš! Couple of questions. AVX-enabled branches are 4.8 and 4.7? I suspect that 4.6 is out of support. Second. I didn't understood point of HJ at all. Did you? (I'll try to reach him via internal IM). -- Thanks, K
