Hi Thomas!
On 13.03.2014 15:38, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Ilmir!
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:34:54 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov <i.usma...@samsung.com> wrote:
Committed as r208533.
Yay! \o/
Thanks! Yay indeed.
And thanks a lot for your comments.
The following change seems the right thing to do -- but why doesn't the
current code trigger a GCC ICE due to a failing subcode check? (At least
I thought you had test cases exercising the respective OpenACC vector
clauses?) Can you please check that? If it's just missing a test case,
feel free to commit that together with my patch.
Unfortunally, I can't check this using a test right now, since OpenACC
loop directive is not implemented yet.
The following cleanup should be fine to check in, or is there a reason
for using OMP_WAIT_EXPR instead of OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT_EXPR?
No, there is no reason for using OMP_WAIT_EXPR. Thanks!
--
Ilmir.
