Hi Kugan
On 3 March 2014 21:56, Kugan <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
> gcc/
>
> 2014-03-03 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
>
> PR target/60034
> * aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_classify_address): Fix alignment for
> section anchor.
>
>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2014-03-03 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
>
> PR target/60034
> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr60034.c: New file.
>
+ else if (SYMBOL_REF_HAS_BLOCK_INFO_P (sym)
This test makes sense.
+ && SYMBOL_REF_ANCHOR_P (sym)
Do we need this test or is the patch being conservative? I would
have thought that it is sufficient to drop this test and just take the
block alignment...
+ && SYMBOL_REF_BLOCK (sym) != NULL)
+ align = SYMBOL_REF_BLOCK (sym)->alignment;
+/* { dg-options "-std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O -Wall -Winline
-Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -frounding-math -g
-Wstrict-prototypes" } */
Can you drop all the options that are not actually required to
reproduce the issue?
Cheers
/Marcus
