Skip to site navigation (Press enter)
Re: std::regex_replace behaviour (LWG DR 2213)
Paolo Carlini
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:59:36 -0800
.. I think it would be cleaner to have new, separate testcases, named
after 2213. This is what we always did in the past when we implemented
resolutions of DRs.
At minimum, refer to 2213 in a comment.
Paolo.
Previous message
View by thread
View by date
Next message
Re: std::regex_replace behaviour (LWG DR 2213)
Tim Shen
Re: std::regex_replace behaviour (LWG DR 2213)
Paolo Carlini
Re: std::regex_replace behaviour (LWG DR 2213)
Tim Shen
Reply via email to
Search the site
The Mail Archive home
gcc-patches - all messages
gcc-patches - about the list
Expand
Previous message
Next message