Hi! On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:13:09AM +0000, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Author: rth > Date: Tue Feb 11 01:12:38 2014 > New Revision: 207677 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207677&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > PR target/59927 > > * calls.c (expand_call): Don't double-push for reg_parm_stack_space. > * config/i386/i386.c (init_cumulative_args): Remove sorry for 64-bit > ms-abi vs -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args. > (ix86_expand_prologue): Unconditionally call ix86_eax_live_at_start_p. > * config/i386/i386.h (ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS): Fix comment with > respect to ms-abi. > > Modified: > trunk/gcc/ChangeLog > trunk/gcc/calls.c > trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c > trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
I've committed following testcase for a PR Richard has fixed: 2014-02-11 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR target/59927 * gcc.target/i386/pr59927.c: New test. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr59927.c.jj 2014-02-11 10:04:10.430559305 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr59927.c 2014-02-11 10:03:54.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +/* PR target/59927 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -g" } */ + +extern void baz (int) __attribute__ ((__ms_abi__)); + +void +foo (void (__attribute__ ((ms_abi)) *fn) (int)) +{ + fn (0); +} + +void +bar (void) +{ + baz (0); +} Jakub