Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
gcc/jit/
* TODO.rst: Update.
---
gcc/jit/ChangeLog.jit | 4 +++
gcc/jit/TODO.rst | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/jit/ChangeLog.jit b/gcc/jit/ChangeLog.jit
index 6950b13..253f239 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/ChangeLog.jit
+++ b/gcc/jit/ChangeLog.jit
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2014-02-10 David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com>
+
+ * TODO.rst: Update.
+
2014-02-06 David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com>
* libgccjit++.h: Include <ostream> rather than <iostream>, since
diff --git a/gcc/jit/TODO.rst b/gcc/jit/TODO.rst
index 0572b78..c149dde 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/TODO.rst
+++ b/gcc/jit/TODO.rst
@@ -18,9 +18,27 @@ Initial Release
* more types:
* unions
* function ptrs
+ * explicitly opaque structs, perhaps:
-* how do you encode "x[5]=y;"? should gcc_jit_context_new_array_lookup()
- return an lvalue rather than an rvalue?
+ extern gcc_jit_type *
+ gcc_jit_context_new_opaque_struct (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
+ const char *name);
+
+ * ability to create self-referential structs, or cycles in the graph:
+
+ struct foo { struct bar *m_bar; }
+ struct bar { struct foo *m_foo; }
+
+ * get int type with given number of either bits or bytes:
+
+ extern gcc_jit_type *
+ gcc_jit_context_get_int_type (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
+ int num_bytes,
+ int is_signed);
+
+ * ability to bind a pre-existing global variable
+
+* expose the statements in the API? (mostly so they can be stringified?)
* explicit casts::
@@ -53,13 +71,6 @@ Initial Release
and, indeed, clarify all of the other operations.
-* array types, in case they're needed for structs::
-
- extern gcc_jit_type *
- gcc_jit_context_new_array_type (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
- gcc_jit_type *type,
- int num_elements);
-
* expressing branch probabilies (like __builtin_expect)::
extern gcc_jit_rvalue *
@@ -74,22 +85,16 @@ Initial Release
be better? (for expressing how hot the current location is)
+* ability to give contexts names, for ease of debugging?
+
* can we call into GCC builtins? What might people need?
* docs
-* fixing all the state issues
-
-* make the dirty dirty hacks less egregious...
-
-* pkgconfig .pc file
-
* add a SONAME to the library (and potentially version the symbols?)
* add myself as maintainer
-* valgrind; fix memory leaks
-
* do we need alternative forms of division (floor vs rounding)?
* are we missing any ops?
@@ -104,7 +109,10 @@ Initial Release
* gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int: must be a numeric type
- * gcc_jit_context_zero: must be a numeric type
+ * gcc_jit_context_zero: must be a numeric type. If we do this should
+ we introduce a gcc_jit_context_null for pointer types? (you can do
+ this via gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_ptr, but having an explicit
+ hook is friendlier).
* gcc_jit_context_one: must be a numeric type
@@ -133,10 +141,35 @@ Initial Release
* gcc_jit_loop_end: verify that loops are validly nested?
+Bugs
+====
+* INTERNAL functions don't seem to work (see e.g. test-quadratic, on trying
+ to make calc_disc be internal leads to:
+ /tmp/libgccjit-4FZm6B/fake.so: undefined symbol: calc_discriminant
+ works at -O3 (because it inlines away the call); fails at -O0
+
+* fixing all the state issues: make it work repeatedly with optimization
+ turned up to full.
+
+* make the dirty dirty hacks less egregious...
+
+* pkgconfig .pc file
+
+* test under valgrind; fix memory leaks
+
+* re-architect gcc so we don't have to reinitialize everything every time
+ a context is compiled
+
Test suite
==========
* get DejaGnu to build and run C++ testcases
+* add a multi-threaded test (perhaps based on test-combination.c, with a
+ thread pool working through multiple instances of the various underlying
+ tests, each thread having a separate gcc_jit_context)
+
+* verify that nested loops work OK
+
Future milestones
=================
* try porting llvmpipe to gcc
--
1.7.11.7
