On 2/9/2014 3:09 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
IMO the natural assumption is that gnu++11 is enabled by default, which is
how Lars also read it.
There seemed to be support for using "warning enabled by default" instead,
so this patch does that. Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
I'll post an Ada patch separately.
FWIW this doesn't seem desirable to me, this will make the diagnostic longer.
For Ada this wouldn't really disambiguate things, and some users may be
dependent on the current format, so changing it isn't very friendly.
Arno
can't we just reword the one warning where there is an ambiguity to
avoid the confusion, rather than creating such an earthquake, which
as Arno says, really has zero advantages to Ada programmers, and clear
disadvantages .. to me [enabled by default] is already awfully long!
