On Sun, 2 Feb 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01168.html
As I understand it, this is only relevant to C++ (in C you should have an
INTEGER_CST here, and if you don't then default_conversion won't give you
one), so would best be reviewed by Jason not me.
I agree, I just wanted to make sure you weren't opposed to using
default_conversion in C as well and were ok with my explanation of why I
was testing FUNCTION_DECL for some attributes (in C++, default_conversion
will accept anything, so I am doing that for the sake of C).
An alternative could be to have a helper function that does nothing in C
and calls default_conversion in C++. Or make the C version of
default_conversion return its argument unchanged instead of asserting when
it sees an unexpected tree.
I'll wait for Jason, thanks.
--
Marc Glisse
