On 01/31/2014 11:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 01/28/2014 01:37 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:... by the way, I don't understand why we are appending the constructor at all for the unnamed bit-field?!? Eg, what about the below?I agree, it doesn't seem necessary; output_constructor deals fine with a sparse CONSTRUCTOR. This patch is OK.
Thanks, applied! Paolo.
