On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:17 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> BTW: There are some ix86_tune == XXX conditions scattered throughout >>> LEA handling code. Can these be substituted with appropriate TARGET_* >>> defines? >> >> I have been looking at them closely to check their impacts on >> both Haswell and Silvermont. I am planning to keep >> the simple LEA -> ADD transformation, but avoid >> the complex LEA -> ADD/MOV/SHL transformation. > > No, I didn't talk about functional change, but about equivalent > TARGET_* define that can be used instead of "(ix86_tune == > PROCESSOR_SILVERMONT) || (ix86_tune == PROCESSOR_INTEL)". > > Uros.
Something like #define TARGET_INTEL_SILVERMONT \ (ix86_tune == PROCESSOR_SILVERMONT || ix86_tune == PROCESSOR_INTEL) -- H.J.
