On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 08:06:07AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 01/15/2014 01:58 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:43:18PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54694.c
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>> >> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> >> +/* { dg-options "-O" } */
>> >> +
>> >> +register void *hfp __asm__("%ebp"); /* { dg-message "note: for" }
>> >> */
>> >
>> > Shouldn't that be %rbp for x86_64? Or do we treat it the same?
>>
>> We treat it the same.
>
> BTW, your fix broke the gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c
> test on i686-linux, the problem is that main normally dynamically realigns
> the stack. Wonder if the test should be turned into dg-do compile,
> or perhaps a hack like:
> int xmain() __asm__ ("main");
> int xmain()
> instead of
> int main()
> to avoid the dynamic stack realigning in main (limit the test to *linux*
> then?), supply main written in assembly, something else?
>
> Jakub
gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c has
register long *B asm ("ebp");
It won't work without -maccumulate-outgoing-args.
--
H.J.
