On 15/01/14 09:23, Terry Guo wrote: > Hi there, > > With trunk enhancement at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00533.html, gcc can properly > handle PLD rtx. Otherwise the PLD rtx will be treated as SET rtx and gcc > will end up with ICE. The attached patch intends to back port this > enhancement to 4.8 branch. Tested with gcc regression test, no new > regressions. Is it ok to back port? > > BR, > Terry > > 2014-01-15 Terry Guo <terry....@arm.com> > > Backported from mainline r204575 and applied to file arm.c. > 2013-11-08 James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> > > * config/arm/aarch-common.c > (search_term): New typedef. > (shift_rtx_costs): New array. > (arm_rtx_shift_left_p): New. > (arm_find_sub_rtx_with_search_term): Likewise. > (arm_find_sub_rtx_with_code): Likewise. > (arm_early_load_addr_dep): Add sanity checking. > (arm_no_early_alu_shift_dep): Likewise. > (arm_no_early_alu_shift_value_dep): Likewise. > (arm_no_early_mul_dep): Likewise. > (arm_no_early_store_addr_dep): Likewise. >
Is there a PR for this?
