On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 05:48:59PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> The patch will need some tweaking, I realized that e.g. for struct S {
> union {}; }; it doesn't do the right thing...

Done in the patch below.  CCing Jason for the C++ part.  Does this
look sane now?

Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64.

2014-01-13  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c/58346
c-family/
        * c-common.c (pointer_to_zero_sized_aggr_p): New function.
        * c-common.h: Declare it.
cp/
        * typeck.c (pointer_diff): Give an error on arithmetic on pointer to
        an empty aggregate.
c/
        * c-typeck.c (pointer_diff): Give an error on arithmetic on pointer to
        an empty aggregate.
testsuite/
        * c-c++-common/pr58346.c: New test.

--- gcc/c-family/c-common.h.mp  2014-01-13 19:02:22.249870601 +0100
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.h     2014-01-13 19:04:15.068294390 +0100
@@ -789,6 +789,7 @@ extern bool keyword_is_storage_class_spe
 extern bool keyword_is_type_qualifier (enum rid);
 extern bool keyword_is_decl_specifier (enum rid);
 extern bool cxx_fundamental_alignment_p (unsigned);
+extern bool pointer_to_zero_sized_aggr_p (tree);
 
 #define c_sizeof(LOC, T)  c_sizeof_or_alignof_type (LOC, T, true, false, 1)
 #define c_alignof(LOC, T) c_sizeof_or_alignof_type (LOC, T, false, false, 1)
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.c.mp  2014-01-13 19:01:20.503637616 +0100
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.c     2014-01-13 19:42:32.805135382 +0100
@@ -11829,4 +11829,17 @@ cxx_fundamental_alignment_p  (unsigned a
                         TYPE_ALIGN (long_double_type_node)));
 }
 
+/* Return true if T is a pointer to a zero-sized struct/union.  */
+
+bool
+pointer_to_zero_sized_aggr_p (tree t)
+{
+  t = strip_pointer_operator (t);
+  if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (t)
+      && TYPE_SIZE (t)
+      && integer_zerop (TYPE_SIZE (t)))
+    return true;
+  return false;
+}
+
 #include "gt-c-family-c-common.h"
--- gcc/cp/typeck.c.mp  2014-01-13 19:08:12.237244663 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/typeck.c     2014-01-13 19:10:23.350742070 +0100
@@ -5043,6 +5043,14 @@ pointer_diff (tree op0, tree op1, tree p
        return error_mark_node;
     }
 
+  if (pointer_to_zero_sized_aggr_p (TREE_TYPE (op1)))
+    {
+      if (complain & tf_error)
+       error ("arithmetic on pointer to an empty aggregate");
+      else
+       return error_mark_node;
+    }
+
   op1 = (TYPE_PTROB_P (ptrtype)
         ? size_in_bytes (target_type)
         : integer_one_node);
--- gcc/c/c-typeck.c.mp 2014-01-13 15:47:01.316105676 +0100
+++ gcc/c/c-typeck.c    2014-01-13 19:58:19.237271626 +0100
@@ -3536,6 +3536,9 @@ pointer_diff (location_t loc, tree op0,
   /* This generates an error if op0 is pointer to incomplete type.  */
   op1 = c_size_in_bytes (target_type);
 
+  if (pointer_to_zero_sized_aggr_p (TREE_TYPE (orig_op1)))
+    error_at (loc, "arithmetic on pointer to an empty aggregate");
+
   /* Divide by the size, in easiest possible way.  */
   result = fold_build2_loc (loc, EXACT_DIV_EXPR, inttype,
                            op0, convert (inttype, op1));
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr58346.c.mp     2014-01-13 15:48:20.011420141 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr58346.c        2014-01-13 20:25:17.544582444 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* PR c/58346 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+struct U {
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+  char a[0];
+#endif
+};
+static struct U b[6];
+static struct U **u1, **u2;
+
+int
+foo (struct U *p, struct U *q)
+{
+  return q - p; /* { dg-error "arithmetic on pointer to an empty aggregate" } 
*/
+}
+
+void
+bar (void)
+{
+  __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ d = u1 - u2; /* { dg-error "arithmetic on pointer to an 
empty aggregate" } */
+  __asm volatile ("" : "+g" (d));
+  foo (&b[0], &b[4]);
+}

        Marek

Reply via email to