On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <carew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Will libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c update be a separate patch? >> Should we use a single definition for both i386.c and libgcc? > > Currently they need to be in the same patch. But yes, moving the definition > out to a common header would probably be a good idea to reduce potential > mismatches in future. This could be a follow-up patch. > How does the patch get commited after being accepted? It has been many years > since I last contributed to gcc, and I can not remember the rest of the > process, and doubt it is still the same. Please send me ChangeLog entries, and I will commit the patch for you. Patch is OK for mainline. Thanks, Uros.
