On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > On 04 Dec 19:59, Kirill Yukhin wrote: >> So, is it ok for trunk? > > Small correction. I think it is better to use > popfql/pushfql instead of popf/pushf (however they're > encoded equally). >
If you define the proper type, you can use pushf/pop and push/popf in the same readeflags/writeflags implementation for -m32/-mx32/-m64. -- H.J.
