On 11/29/2013 06:12 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 06:07:38PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> By what mechanism do you choose? This is unclear to me from what I've >> seen. Does this involve user action, and what's the advantage of doing >> it this way? > > See the 3 threads I've mentioned. The compiler would know the list of > available offloading targets (after all, it needs to build libgomp plugins > for those targets), and that would be the default, and user could override > that through link time command line options (say, ok, while gcc has been > configured to support all of hsail-none, ptx-none and x86_64-k10m-linux > offloading targets, I only want to support here one of those, and > please use these additional options for compilation of that target).
Ok, IIUC the model is that we just compile all target code for all targets (or a subset of them). Is that correct? In that case I can see how the code that's on the branch now is sufficient; I'd assumed something more fine-grained would be desirable. It would be helpful to see the other pieces of this work if they already exist. Bernd
