On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote: > Hello Richard, > > as a follow-up patch to the bit-fields patch(es), I wanted to remove the > dependencies on > the variable flag_strict_volatile_bitfields from expand_assignment and > expand_expr_real_1. > Additionally I want the access mode of the field to be selected in the memory > context, > instead of the structure's mode. > > Boot-strapped and regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. > > OK for trunk?
Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Thanks > Bernd. > > > FYI - these are my in-flight patches, which would be nice to go into the GCC > 4.9.0 release: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02046.html :[PATCH] reimplement > -fstrict-volatile-bitfields v4, part 1/2 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02025.html :[PATCH] Fix C++0x > memory model for -fno-strict-volatile-bitfields on ARM > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02291.html : > [PATCH, PR 57748] Check for out of bounds access, Part 2 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00581.html :[PATCH, PR 57748] > Check for out of bounds access, Part 3 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00133.html:[PATCH] Fix PR58115
