On 11/27/13 10:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:48:11PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/15/2013 02:23 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
One small thing that I have not done that Jakub and several other have asked me
before is that, there are no tests in c-c++-common for _Cilk_for. The reason being
that the syntax between C and C++ implementations are different. In C++, the
induction variable must be defined in the initializer (e.g. it should start wth
_Cilk_for (int ii = 0....)). In C, this is not allowed (e.g. it should start as
_Cilk_for (ii = 0; ii < 10; ii++)).
That can be handled with #ifdef __cplusplus.
It isn't allowed even in C99? For OpenMP,
int a[30];
void
foo ()
{
#pragma omp for
for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++)
a[i] = i;
}
is valid for C99. So, perhaps you just want
/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99" { target c } } */
in the c-c++-common tests?
Jakub
Yup, that's what I did for the Cilk Plus pragma simd tests.
