Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> writes:
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
> <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I decided to lump these together since the problems were the same.
>> There were some typos in the real_to_integer invocation, while changing:
>> 
>>      /* There must be no padding.  */
>>      if (!host_integerp (TYPE_SIZE (type), 1)
>>          || (tree_low_cst (TYPE_SIZE (type), 1)
>>              != count * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (*modep)))
>>        return -1;
>> 
>> to:
>> 
>>      if (!tree_fits_uhwi_p (TYPE_SIZE (type))
>>          || (tree_to_uhwi (TYPE_SIZE (type))
>>              != count * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (*modep)))
>>        return -1;
>> 
>> introduced a signed/unsigned warning.
>> 
>> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnueabi & arm-linux-gnueabi and applied as
>> obvious.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
>> Index: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c     (revision 204311)
>> +++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c     (working copy)
>> @@ -6030,9 +6030,7 @@
>>                    - tree_to_uhwi (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (index)));
>> 
>>      /* There must be no padding.  */
>> -    if (!tree_fits_uhwi_p (TYPE_SIZE (type))
>> -        || (tree_to_uhwi (TYPE_SIZE (type))
>> -            != count * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (*modep)))
>> +    if (wi::ne_p (TYPE_SIZE (type), count * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (*modep)))
>>        return -1;
>
> So, one of the review comments concerns this type of change.  The
> specific comment was from David on rs6000 point #5.
>
> My (our) question is, doesn't Ada have non-INTEGER_CST TYPE_SIZE
> (type), and the old code had this type of check:
>
> bool
> tree_fits_uhwi_p (const_tree t)
> {
>   return (t != NULL_TREE
>           && TREE_CODE (t) == INTEGER_CST
>           && TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (t) == 0);
> }
>
> to ensure that things that are not INTEGER_CSTs return -1.  In the new
> code, won't this just call wi::ne_p, and die?

Ah, sorry, hadn't realised that was possible here.  In that case I agree
we should keep the INTEGER_CST check.  I.e.:

        if (TREE_CODE (TYPE_SIZE (type)) != INTEGER_CST
            || wi::ne_p (TYPE_SIZE (type), count * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (*modep)))
          return -1;

Thanks,
Richard

Reply via email to