Hi Michael, On 24 July 2013 10:29, David Holsgrove <david.holsgr...@xilinx.com> wrote: > On 24 July 2013 10:22, Michael Eager <ea...@eagerm.com> wrote: >> On 07/23/13 16:23, David Holsgrove wrote: >>> >>> On 24 July 2013 07:10, Michael Eager <ea...@eagerm.com> wrote: >>>> >>> Thanks Michael. >>> >>> I think the content of your commit doesnt line up with this Changelog >>> entry or mail though, >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=c4fcbf4cd03c11aa1bc707b00dd95ba52f963b39 >>> >>> It looks like the atomic builtin patch which was posted as this mail; >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00551.html >> >> >> Yes, I picked up the wrong ChangeLog and email. I fixed the ChangeLog. >> > > No worries, thanks Michael. >
In the confusion with changelogs / patches here, I dont think this change was ever applied to gcc master. I've attached an up to date version of the same patch for you to apply when ready. thanks again, David > regards, > David > >> >> -- >> Michael Eager ea...@eagercon.com >> 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
0004-Patch-microblaze-Add-TARGET_ASM_OUTPUT_MI_THUNK-to-s.patch
Description: Binary data
