On Nov 20, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Richard Sandiford <rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > cst_fits_shwi_p replaces cst_and_fits_in_hwi, but if cst_fits_uhwi_p > goes away then I think we might as well stick with the original name.
So the entire patch seems fine, except for one hunk I'll punt to Kenny to weigh in and those are the changes of the form: - if (!cst_fits_shwi_p (tdiff)) + if (!cst_and_fits_in_hwi (tiff))
