On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> No, they should use { dg-add-options mpx } (well, both the directory name
> and the dg-add-options argument should use whatever generic name for this
> functionality we ended up with, rather than the name for the particular
> instance of it on x86, so say gcc.dg/chkp and dg-add-options chkp). The
> add_options_for_chkp function should then check the target and add the
> appropriate options depending on the target.
Of course, better than { dg-add-options chkp } in every test would be some
generic code in a .exp file that arranges for the right options (still
target-specific) to be added automatically for every test in the
directory.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[email protected]
