On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:50:45AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Richard Sandiford
> <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Add tree_fits_shwi_p and tree_fits_uhwi_p. The implementations are taken
> > directly from host_integerp.
>
> tree_ is a bit generic - you only ever return true for INTEGER_CSTs,
> so please use int_fits_[su]hwi_p please (mimicing int_fits_type_p).
>
> Ok with that change.
I actually think tree_fits is better, int_fits* looks too ambiguous to me,
what kind of integer (tree, int, HWI, ...) you actually mean.
It also matches better say the preexisting tree_to_double_int.
Jakub
