On Nov 15, 2013, at 8:23 PM, "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji.v.i...@intel.com> wrote: > This is already done in my patch for _Cilk-spawn and _Cilk_sync support for > C++. The patch was submitted ~3-4 weeks ago.
Ping once a day until reviewed. :-) You should form a new patch and post it and be sure to cc jason on that email. It is possible he just hasn't seen it yet. Be sure to post and ping the work. > It is currently under review > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg01807.html). I saw no evidence it is currently under review. I think the state is, jason hasn't been cced on the C++ patch and don't know of its existence. >> The -fcilkplus in *.exp is redundant with that option in *.{c,cc}. Please >> remove one instance of them. > > It is sort of like a safety measure We don't want a sort of safety measure. > since there are some error tests which may have dg-options omitted. Once you decide if those test are wrong for not having dg-options, or not, the rest will just fall out. > if it is really bad, I can put it in the tests and remove from the options. Yes, it is really bad, thanks.
