On 2013-11-01 21:46, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,Il giorno 01/nov/2013, alle ore 21:09, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> ha scritto: Here's the final version of Luc's optional implementation that I'm committing, tested on x86_64-linux.Great. Just noticed a minor nit: the fallback __constexpr_addressof appears not to be inline. Paolo
Can you expand? I think it's just as much inline as the other overload -- does it need to be different?
