On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/25/13 11:57, Ilya Enkovich wrote: > >> >> There are currently two known issues with LTO. The first one is ICE in >> LTO streamer when it reads instrumented code. The second one is >> unitialized flag_check_pointers when code is compiled by lto1 (do you >> know why it may happen BTW?). It also causes ICE beacause instrumented >> code is met when not expected. Of course, I'll fix these problems >> anyway, but I was going to allow '-fcheck-pointers -flto' only when >> checker testsuite has 100% pass rate with lto. > > No idea about why LTO would be failing in this way -- my experience with LTO > is virtually nil. > > I'm OK with the restriction as a temporary measure. But we really dislike > this kidn of stuff, so I need a commitment from you to dive into these > problems and sort out what's really going on.
I'm not ok with adding such arbitrary restrictions. LTO support should be trivial. Richard. > >> >> Ilya >> >
