Just something I noticed while reviewing a patch. Committed.
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index e525748..013fe73 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2013-10-28 Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> + + * lower-subreg.c (resolve_simple_move): Fix comment typo. + 2013-10-28 Trevor Saunders <tsaund...@mozilla.com> * df-scan.c (df_collection_rec): Adjust. diff --git a/gcc/lower-subreg.c b/gcc/lower-subreg.c index 8ff5fc3..ebf364f 100644 --- a/gcc/lower-subreg.c +++ b/gcc/lower-subreg.c @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ resolve_simple_move (rtx set, rtx insn) emit_insn_before (insns, insn); - /* If we get here via self-recutsion, then INSN is not yet in the insns + /* If we get here via self-recursion, then INSN is not yet in the insns chain and delete_insn will fail. We only want to remove INSN from the current sequence. See PR56738. */ if (in_sequence_p ())