Just something I noticed while reviewing a patch.  Committed.



diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index e525748..013fe73 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2013-10-28  Jeff Law  <l...@redhat.com>
+
+       * lower-subreg.c (resolve_simple_move): Fix comment typo.
+
 2013-10-28  Trevor Saunders  <tsaund...@mozilla.com>
 
        * df-scan.c (df_collection_rec): Adjust.
diff --git a/gcc/lower-subreg.c b/gcc/lower-subreg.c
index 8ff5fc3..ebf364f 100644
--- a/gcc/lower-subreg.c
+++ b/gcc/lower-subreg.c
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ resolve_simple_move (rtx set, rtx insn)
 
   emit_insn_before (insns, insn);
 
-  /* If we get here via self-recutsion, then INSN is not yet in the insns
+  /* If we get here via self-recursion, then INSN is not yet in the insns
      chain and delete_insn will fail.  We only want to remove INSN from the
      current sequence.  See PR56738.  */
   if (in_sequence_p ())

Reply via email to