Hi Tobias,
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Any comments? Or is the patch OK?
thanks for doing this.
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===================================================================
+ <li>With the new <a
+ href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Loop_002dSpecific-Pragmas.html";
+ ><code>#pragma GCC ivdep</code></a>, the user can assert that there are no
+ loop-carried dependencies which would prevent that consecutive iterations
of
+ the following loop can be executed concurrently with SIMD (single
instruction
+ multiple data) instructions.</li>
That would flow a bit nicer if you say "...prevent concurrent execution
of consecutive iterations using..." or something like that, I believe?
+ allocatable components of variables declared in the main program. The
+ Fortran standard states since 2008 explicitly that variables declared
+ in the Fortran main program automatically have the <code>SAVE</code>
+ attribute.</li>
How about "Since 2008 the Fortran standard..." or "Fortran 2008 and later
standards..." ?
+ about <code>DO</code> loops with zero iterations. This warning is now
Good catch!
The patch looks good if you consider my comments (which is not
necessarily the same as following all of them ;-).
Gerald
