ok after testing. David
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Rong Xu <x...@google.com> wrote: > you are right. > fixed in the attached patch. > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> > wrote: >> >> Why is it needed to encode module id in the name? If the statics are >> promoted later, it will be inserted at that time. >> >> David >> >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Rong Xu <x...@google.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > The attached patch fixes some linking errors (undefined symbols) in >> > LIPO-use >> > build. >> > r203583 does not seem to be complete as we may create different names in >> > auxiliary and primary compilation because the counters are not reset >> > after >> > popping the parsing stack. >> > >> > Patch passed with the failing program. Other tests are ongoing. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > -Rong >> > > >
