On 10/09/2013 01:48 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/08/2013 06:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
unvisit_body isn't generic enough to warrant moving out of gimplify.c
(the only user).
Bah, now I remember.. so there *are* other users.. this routine is
called from various front ends.. fortran, c-family and cp all call it.
That is why I wanted to move it to tree.[ch]. it doesn't belong in a
gimple file.. it operates on trees and is also used by tree front
ends.
But afaik as part of gimplifying. The gimplifier is part of the
frontend-middleend interface. Lumping all of it into tree.c isn't sustainable.
Richard.
Fair enough. I'll adjust... the front end files which use that
routine will just have to include gimplify.h
Andrew
