On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/02/2013 04:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> This patch moves prototypes into gimple-fold.h (which already existed). >>> There were a few in tree-flow.h and a bunch in gimple.h. The routines are >>> used frequently enough that it makes sense to include gimple-fold.h from >>> gimple.h instead of from within each .c file that needs it. (presumably >>> why >>> the prototypes were in gimple.h to begin with). I took gimple-fold.h out >>> of >>> whatever .c files it was included in. >>> >>> tree-ssa-copy.h was also created for the prototypes in that file and >>> included from tree-ssa.h. >> >> These should probably be moved elsewhere (tree-ssa-copy.c is supposed >> to be the copy propagation pass file). But that can be done as followup. >> >> > hmm, easy enough to move them *all* to tree-ssa-propagate.[ch] right now and > check it in... That seems like the right place for all of them and then we > don't even need to create tree-ssa-copy.h...?
Yeah. Richard. > Andrew
