Hi, > Il giorno 02/ott/2013, alle ore 00:21, Tim Shen <timshe...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> What do you mean by "not well defined"? Non confoming? Why? > > I don't know if the word 'define' is appropriate, maybe I should just > use 'implement'. > > It's indeed the problem that needs extra support from <locale>, > described by [28.7.7]. More detailed, > http://www.open-std.org/Jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2003/n1429.htm > offered what the function means.
Ok, thus just say that transform_primary is unimplented. Please also add a comment inline in the code explaining the issue, but don't word it in term of <locale>, because <locale> is just what it is per C++11, and doesn't directly provide what we need in the public interface (if I understand the issue): just say that implementing the function appears to require libc support + a link to the message you sent a couple of weeks ago to the libstdc++-v3 mailing list. Ok with the above changes. Thanks! Paolo
