On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Well, in this case the patch should IMHO be a no-op.
> 
> -      warning (OPT_Wunused_parameter, "unused parameter %q+D", decl);
> +      warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl), OPT_Wunused_parameter,
> +               "unused parameter %qD", decl);
> 
> no?  Unless I misunderstand what %q+D should do.

The question is how exactly is %q+D defined, if it is
warning_at (location_of (decl), OPT_Wunused_parameter, "unused parameter %qD", 
decl); in this case, or 
DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl) instead.

        Jakub

Reply via email to