On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Gaby,
>
>
> On 09/08/2013 03:41 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, Gaby,
>>>
>>> in this bug Manuel noticed that the zeros in the diagnostic lines of the
>>> form:
>>>
>>> <built-in>:0:0: ....
>>>
>>> don't provide useful information. Thus the below just avoids printing the
>>> zeros basing directly on the file name: admittedly, it may seem a bit
>>> gross,
>>> but in practice the strcmp would often fail early, and should be rather
>>> efficient anyway because the second argument is known at compile-time.
>>
>> For builtins, we probably do not want to print the line number
>> and the column number (both of which are zero).
>
> I agree. This is exactly what my patch does, isn't it?

What I meant is that we should not showing a location at all.
I misread the original hunk

+     : !strcmp (s.file, N_("<built-in>"))
+     ? build_message_string ("%s%s:%s %s%s%s", locus_cs, s.file, locus_ce,
+     text_cs, text, text_ce)

Sorry.  Patch OK.

>
> Thanks,
> Paolo.

Reply via email to