On 06/09/13 14:44, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patch updates the AArch64 backend such that floating point
> moves are correctly categorized with type "FMOV".
> 
> Then in the ARM backend we rename "FCPYS" to "FMOV" everywhere
> where it is appropriate to do so.
> 
> Regression tested on aarch64-none-elf and arm-none-eabi with no
> regressions.
> 
> OK?
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> ---
> gcc/
> 
> 2013-09-06  James Greenhalgh  <james.greenha...@arm.com>
> 
>       * config/arm/types.md (type): Rename fcpys to fmov.
>       * config/arm/vfp.md
>       (*arm_movsi_vfp): Rename type fcpys as fmov.
>       (*thumb2_movsi_vfp): Likewise
>       (*movhf_vfp_neon): Likewise
>       (*movhf_vfp): Likewise
>       (*movsf_vfp): Likewise
>       (*thumb2_movsf_vfp): Likewise
>       (*movsfcc_vfp): Likewise
>       (*thumb2_movsfcc_vfp): Likewise
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
>       (move_lo_quad_<mode>): Replace type mov_reg with fmovs.
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64.md
>       (*movsi_aarch64): Replace type mov_reg with fmovs.
>       (*movdi_aarch64): Likewise
>       (*movsf_aarch64): Likewise
>       (*movdf_aarch64): Likewise
>       * config/arm/arm.c
>       (cortexa7_older_only): Rename TYPE_FCPYS to TYPE_FMOV.
>       * config/arm/iwmmxt.md
>       (*iwmmxt_movsi_insn): Rename type fcpys as fmov.
>       * config/arm/arm1020e.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-a15-neon.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-a5.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-a53.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-a7.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-a8-neon.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-a9.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-m4-fpu.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/cortex-r4f.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/marvell-pj4.md: Update with new attributes.
>       * config/arm/vfp11.md: Update with new attributes.
> 
> 

OK.

R.

Reply via email to