2013/9/5 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhni...@google.com>: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Daniel Krügler > <daniel.krueg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I expect that this kind of index violation is a rather often occurring >> pattern and should be isolated. IMO the _M_range >> _check now pessimisms the normal, non-violating case. > > Did you mean "pessimises code size", or something else?
Yes. - Daniel