On 09/04/2013 06:04 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > this is third fallout of my change to remove DECL_ARGUMENTS/DECL_RESULT for > functions w/o > bodies I did not really anticipate. [...] > I would like to basically ask if it seems to make sense to go this route and > try to get rid of those declarations.
I'm currently working on a new target, ptx, which uses a pseudo-assembler where functions (even extern ones) need to be declared with their arguments and return types. With my current code I have to look at DECL_ARGUMENTS fairly late in the compilation. I'm not quite sure yet whether the change to delete them will break the backend. Bernd
