Le 26/08/2013 16:16, Janus Weil a écrit : >>>> I'm slightly inclined to kindly invite the user to switch to >>>> STORAGE_SIZE+SIZE instead. Any other opinion? >>> >>> Since the SIZEOF intrinsic has been around for some time in gfortran >>> (before STORAGE_SIZE was available), I would say we should at least >>> continue to support it for backward compatibility. And I guess we >>> should also make it behave reasonably for all inputs. However, it >>> might be worth to add a note in the documentation that STORAGE_SIZE >>> and SIZE should be used instead in standard-conforming code. >>> >> I thought about it again, and what I'm actually in favor of is >> diagnosing by default _all_ extensions having a standard replacement. > > By 'diagnosing' you mean to give a warning? This can already be > accomplished by compiling with "-std=f2008 -Wintrinsics-std", I guess > (not by default, though). > Yes, it would boil down to using that by default.
> Using only -std=f2008 currently results in errors like: > > undefined reference to `sizeof_' > ... which is the best we can do, as sizeof could be a user externally-defined function. Mikael
