Ping? Ping?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Caroline Tice <cmt...@google.com> wrote: > Ping? > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Caroline Tice <cmt...@google.com> wrote: >> This patch replaces the fixed sized array that was holding vtable >> pointers for a particular class hierarchy with a vector, allowing for >> dynamic resizing. It also fixes issues with the warning diagnostics. >> I am in the process of running regression tests with this patch; >> assuming they all pass, is this patch OK to commit? >> >> -- Caroline Tice >> cmt...@google.com >> >> 2013-08-08 Caroline Tice <cmt...@google.com> >> >> * vtable-class-hierarchy.c: Remove unnecessary include statements. >> (MAX_SET_SIZE): Remove unnecessary constant. >> (register_construction_vtables): Make vtable_ptr_array parameter >> into a vector; remove num_args parameter. Change array accesses to >> vector accesses. >> (register_other_binfo_vtables): Ditto. >> (insert_call_to_register_set): Ditto. >> (insert_call_to_register_pair): Ditto. >> (output_set_info): Ditto. Also change warning calls to warning_at >> calls, and fix format of warning messages. >> (register_all_pairs): Change vtbl_ptr_array from an array into a >> vector. Remove num_vtable_args (replace with calls to vector >> length). >> Change array stores & accesses to vector functions. Change calls to >> register_construction_vtables, register_other_binfo_vtables, >> insert_call_to_register_set, insert_call_to_register_pair and >> output_set_info to match their new signatures. Change warning to >> warning_at and fix the format of the warning message.
