Richard Biener <[email protected]> writes: > > The patch fails to add documentation.
That seems like a feature, it's likely not useful for the general public. More for specialized tools that automatically search for the best tuning. > And I am nervous about testing > coverage - is this considered a development option only or are random > combinations expected to work in all situations? I expect not, thus > this looks like a dangerous option? When it's undocumented it doesn't need to work in every situation? -Andi -- [email protected] -- Speaking for myself only
