---
 gcc/cp/pt.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index a7baaba..99bc71b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ determine_specialization (tree template_id,
          tree decl_arg_types;
 
          /* This is an ordinary member function.  However, since
-            we're here, we can assume it's enclosing class is a
+            we're here, we can assume its enclosing class is a
             template class.  For example,
 
               template <typename T> struct S { void f(); };
@@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ check_default_tmpl_args (tree decl, tree parms, bool 
is_primary,
          || DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
     /* We already checked these parameters when the template was
        declared, so there's no need to do it again now.  This function
-       was defined in class scope, but we're processing it's body now
+       was defined in class scope, but we're processing its body now
        that the class is complete.  */
     return true;
 
@@ -7482,7 +7482,7 @@ lookup_template_class_1 (tree d1, tree arglist, tree 
in_decl, tree context,
        the one of #0.
 
        When we encounter #1, we want to store the partial instantiation
-       of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in it's CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
+       of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in its CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
 
        For all cases other than this "explicit specialization of member of a
        class template", we just want to store the most general template into
-- 
1.8.3

Reply via email to