Ping? Thanks, Kyrill
> -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Kyrylo Tkachov > Sent: 23 July 2013 10:09 > To: 'Richard Sandiford' > Cc: gcc-patches; mi...@it.uu.se; 'Richard Biener' > Subject: RE: [PATCH][4.8 backport] Fix PR57735 > > Hi Richard, > > > Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> writes: > > > "Kyrylo Tkachov" <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> writes: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> The fix for PR57735 is in current trunk (for a different issue I > > think), just > > >> needs a backport to 4.8. > > >> It is r198462 by Richard Sandiford: > > >> > > >> 2013-04-30 Richard Sandiford <rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > >> > > >> * explow.c (plus_constant): Pass "mode" to > immed_double_int_const. > > >> Use gen_int_mode rather than GEN_INT. > > >> > > >> Ok to backport to the 4.8 branch? > > > > > > Sorry for dropping the ball. It's already been approved for 4.8, > > > and I think I even remembered to test it ready for commit. I just > > > never actually hit commit afterwards :-( > > > > *sigh*. Scratch that. I'd confused it with: > > > > 2013-05-22 Richard Sandiford <rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > * recog.c (offsettable_address_addr_space_p): Fix calculation of > > address mode. Move pointer mode initialization to the same place. > > > > which I _did_ apply to 4.8. Sorry about the confusion instead... > > It's ok, didn't have time to act on the confusion anyway :) > > So is the proposed one ok to backport? I've bootstrapped it on > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and tested on arm-none-eabi with qemu. > > > Thanks, > Kyrill > > > >
