Hi, On 07/26/2013 02:11 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
Isn't the name a little misleading? I immediately wondered what was wrong with std::is_same. IMHO something a little longer/technical clarifying that the trait isn't just about comparing types is in order...This patch implements a new trait __is_same_as. This is foundational for future work on concepts in that it provides a mechanism for reasoning about type equivalences.
Paolo.
