Committed as r201254. Cheers, Janus
2013/7/25 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: > 2013/7/25 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de>: >> Janus Weil wrote: >>> >>> 2013/7/25 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de>: >>> >>>> Looks fine to me. (If I tracked the PR correctly, it only solves the >>>> original problem but not yet the one of comment 5, does it?) >>> >>> No, this one should actually fix both. I can also add the variant from >>> comment 5 to the test case, if you prefer. >> >> >> I think that would be good - maybe in a separate module but in the same >> file? > > Same module should be ok, too, I guess. Also it might be good to check > for the subroutine case (specific and generic), which should actually > throw an error message. > > That my first patch showed no regressions indicates that such a check > is missing in the testsuite. > > I'll commit the attached version ... > > Cheers, > Janus
