Quoting Georg-Johann Lay <g...@gcc.gnu.org>:
Joern Rennecke wrote:
xfail for avr*-*-*
Hi,
the target machine is avr-*-* because, say, avr32 (a 32-bit MCU not
officially
supported) is a quite different architecture than avr.
Similar for your other testsuite patches with avr*-*-*
I have attached amended versions of the patches 7/8/9/14.
tested for avr using --target_board=atmega128-sim .
2013-07-22 Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com>
* gcc.dg/pr46647.c: xfail for avr-*-*.
Index: gcc.dg/pr46647.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/pr46647.c (revision 201032)
+++ gcc.dg/pr46647.c (working copy)
@@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ func3 (void)
return 0;
}
-/* The xfail for cris-* and crisv32-* is due to PR53535. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "memset" "optimized" { xfail cris-*-*
crisv32-*-* } } } */
+/* The xfail for avr, cris-* and crisv32-* is due to PR53535. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "memset" "optimized" { xfail avr-*-*
cris-*-* crisv32-*-* } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
2013-07-22 Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com>
* gcc.dg/pr53265.c: Disable test for avr-*-*.
Index: gcc.dg/pr53265.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/pr53265.c (revision 201032)
+++ gcc.dg/pr53265.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/53265 */
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { ! avr-*-* } } } */ /* Don't run if arrays are
too large. */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -Wall" } */
void bar (void *);
2013-07-22 Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com>
* gcc.dg/strlenopt-10.c [avr-*-*]: Reduce number of expected
memcpy by one.
* gcc.dg/strlenopt-11.c [avr-*-*]: Likewise.
Expect l to be optimized away.
* gcc.dg/strlenopt-13.c [avr-*-*]: Likewise.
Index: gcc.dg/strlenopt-10.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/strlenopt-10.c (revision 201032)
+++ gcc.dg/strlenopt-10.c (working copy)
@@ -70,7 +70,10 @@ main ()
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strlen \\(" 2 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 8 "strlen" } } */
+/* avr has BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT 8, allowing fold_builtin_memory_op
+ to expand the memcpy call at the end of fn2. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 8 "strlen" { target { !
avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 7 "strlen" { target {
avr-*-* } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strcpy \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strcat \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strchr \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
Index: gcc.dg/strlenopt-11.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/strlenopt-11.c (revision 201032)
+++ gcc.dg/strlenopt-11.c (working copy)
@@ -59,12 +59,18 @@ main ()
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strlen \\(" 3 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 7 "strlen" } } */
+/* avr has BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT 8, allowing fold_builtin_memory_op
+ to expand the memcpy call at the end of fn1. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 7 "strlen" { target { !
avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 6 "strlen" { target {
avr-*-* } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strcpy \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strcat \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strchr \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "stpcpy \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.0. = " 1 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.6. = " 1 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.9. = " 1 "strlen" } } */
+/* Where the memcpy is expanded, the assignemts to elements of l are
+ propagated. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.0. = " 1 "strlen" { target { ! avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.6. = " 1 "strlen" { target { ! avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.9. = " 1 "strlen" { target { ! avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen \\(\[^\n\r\]*;" 3
"strlen" { target { avr-*-* } } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "strlen" } } */
Index: gcc.dg/strlenopt-13.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/strlenopt-13.c (revision 201032)
+++ gcc.dg/strlenopt-13.c (working copy)
@@ -56,13 +56,19 @@ main ()
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strlen \\(" 4 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 7 "strlen" } } */
+/* avr has BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT 8, allowing fold_builtin_memory_op
+ to expand the memcpy call at the end of fn1. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 7 "strlen" { target { !
avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy \\(" 6 "strlen" { target {
avr-*-* } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strcpy \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strcat \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "strchr \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "stpcpy \\(" 0 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.0. = " 1 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.1. = " 1 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.5. = " 1 "strlen" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.6. = " 1 "strlen" } } */
+/* Where the memcpy is expanded, the assignemts to elements of l are
+ propagated. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.0. = " 1 "strlen" { target { ! avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.1. = " 1 "strlen" { target { ! avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.5. = " 1 "strlen" { target { ! avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen
\\(\[^\n\r\]*;\[\n\r\]* l.6. = " 1 "strlen" { target { ! avr-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " _\[0-9\]* = strlen \\(\[^\n\r\]*;" 4
"strlen" { target { avr-*-* } } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "strlen" } } */
2013-07-22 Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com>
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c: Add avr-*-* to list of targets to
exclude from scan test.
Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c (revision 201032)
+++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c (working copy)
@@ -35,6 +35,6 @@ Cyc_string_ungetc (int ignore, struct _f
/* Whether the structs are totally scalarized or not depends on the
MOVE_RATIO macro defintion in the back end. The scalarization will
not take place when using small values for MOVE_RATIO. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _ans" 0 "optimized" {
target { ! "arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _T2" 0 "optimized" {
target { ! "arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _ans" 0 "optimized" {
target { ! "arm*-*-* avr-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _T2" 0 "optimized" {
target { ! "arm*-*-* avr-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
