On Jul 18, 2013, at 6:48 AM, Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> wrote: > running the cilk-plus.exp tests I get ~200 FAILs because the tests are not > written for 16-bit int or size_t platforms. > > As a quick tentative fix, the cilk-plus tests are skipped on such platforms.
I think this patch is fine. Until such time until cilk can do better, I think this is a fine way to address the issue. The other possible way is to not spin up any support for cilk on such a platform in the first place. noconfigdir is one common way to do this.
