Hi,

"Fabien ChĂȘne" <fabien.ch...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

>Then, It seems to me that such a change should ideally go in a separate
>patch.

Yes. Frankly I thought it was already clear that for the purpose of fixing this 
c++ issue we weren't inventing anything new in the library. Just in case isn't 
fully clear to everybody, we are talking about a very special case in the *tr1* 
code, which by now is barely maintained. If we want to be super safe and we 
want the c++ improvement for 4.9, we have to commit the whole package now.

Paolo

Reply via email to