On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 05:54:10PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
I don't really see why, as I am still calling c_build_vec_perm_expr
in the same cases, just possibly not exactly with the same arguments
(they don't go through build_non_dependent_expr, but Jason seemed to
imply that it did not matter since we don't look too deep through
the arguments).
I guess you're right. If the c_* routine doesn't mind C++ specific trees
and just cares about their types and pt.c then instantiates it, then it is
fine.
Even if both are fine, if you prefer the long version (safer, or more uniform
with the rest), please say so, I don't mind.
I committed the short version, since that's the one I currently had in my
tree (and I had tested it). We can always change it later.
Thanks to you both for the comments,
--
Marc Glisse
