Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> writes:
> Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> writes:
>> Index: lra.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- lra.c    (revision 199753)
>> +++ lra.c    (working copy)
>> @@ -306,11 +306,11 @@ lra_emit_add (rtx x, rtx y, rtx z)
>>        || (disp != NULL_RTX && ! CONSTANT_P (disp))
>>        || (scale != NULL_RTX && ! CONSTANT_P (scale)))
>>      {
>> -      /* Its is not an address generation.  Probably we have no 3 op
>> +      /* It is not an address generation.   Probably we have no 3 op
>>           add.  Last chance is to use 2-op add insn.  */
>>        lra_assert (x != y && x != z);
>> -      emit_move_insn (x, z);
>> -      insn = gen_add2_insn (x, y);
>> +      emit_move_insn (x, y);
>> +      insn = gen_add2_insn (x, z);
>>        emit_insn (insn);
>>      }
>>        else
>
> Could you add a comment to lra_emit_add saying why it has to be this
> way round (move y, add z)?

Ping.

Reply via email to