This improves the diagnostics messages in case we're using initial
declarations in the for loop, but we're not using C99 or newer standard;
in this case we shouldn't forget about =c11 and =gnu11, where the
initial declaration is fine as well.
Ok for trunk?
2013-06-17 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
PR c/57630
* c-decl.c (check_for_loop_decls): Improve diagnostics messages.
--- gcc/c/c-decl.c.mp2 2013-06-17 11:23:18.007191155 +0200
+++ gcc/c/c-decl.c 2013-06-17 11:32:47.410472006 +0200
@@ -8503,11 +8503,12 @@ check_for_loop_decls (location_t loc, bo
the C99 for loop scope. This doesn't make much sense, so don't
allow it. */
error_at (loc, "%<for%> loop initial declarations "
- "are only allowed in C99 mode");
+ "are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode");
if (hint)
{
inform (loc,
- "use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code");
+ "use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 "
+ "to compile your code");
hint = false;
}
return NULL_TREE;
Marek
